WHAT'S A VIVID?


I just wanted to take a moment to chuck a question out there. I want to know people's opinion on this, because I know my opinion and I know BUCKTON's opinion, but I can't speak for the plethora of better-informed pornography fans out there. So tell me: Is Vivid a relevant studio any more?

I mean, Vivid was obviously the kingpin of the industry in days gone by. I spent most of my teenage years whacking off to shit-tons of Vivid comps, mostly starring the likes of Asia Carrera, Jill Kelly, Chasey Lain and a still-ponytailed Tom Byron. But these days, they just don't seem to have the presence that they once did. But, like I said, this is just my opinion and I can't really back it up with any hard data.

See, in addition to my affiliation with POPPORN, I find myself affiliated with a Philadelphia porno retailer called TLARAW.com. This is no secret. Sure, I usually don't really highlight that connection, mostly because I prefer to have POPPORN exists as it's own entity where we can say what we want about anybody without fear of losing sales or whatnot (not that we worry too much about that anyway). But there it is. And TLA recently launched the 2010 TLARAW Awards, a nothing-more-than-a-bit-of-fun hijink designed to highlight what we thought to be the apex of the years pornography. We thought it would be a neat little exercise and maybe it would get some more people buying porno from us. Ingenious, right? So we looked at our sales numbers for the past year and used those to pick out a handful of nominees. We thought we picked some viable contenders. A Belladonna picture, a Digital Playground picture, an Elegant Angel movie that happens to boast the best cover shot I've ever seen, a celebrated New Sensation's parody, an awesome-as-fuck Wicked feature, and yes, we nominated the movie that we made (which, I should point out, really is not affiliated with TLA in any way other than it was made by some people who work there. TLA doesn't own it, doesn't have a financial stake in it, etc. If anything, they lost some hours from workers who took vacation days to go shoot a porn movie).

But then this Ryan Rayzer dude accused us of playing favorites and, in fact, laying some sort of "smack down" on Vivid! Whatta revoltin' development! And he's right, Vivid didn't earn a single nomination our...ahem..."prestigious" awards.

Now, the guy makes some good points, and there's some back and forth discussing these points in the subsequent comments on Ryan's column, so I don't want to re-hash all that shit. What I want to get into is the question itself. Is Vivid a relevant studio anymore in the porn world? I mostly ask, because I can't seem to find many people who have a very high opinion of Vivid's output anymore. I'm not saying there's not ANY good porn coming out of Vivid anymore. I'm a big fan of Meggan Mallone and Hanna Hilton, but I can't say I've seen many Vivid movies in the past year that those two weren't a part of. Throat had some boss fuck scenes, but, quite frankly, if I have to sit through another Paul Thomas snooze-o-rama, my fast-forward button might just stop working altogether. Shit be boring.

When I think of the "big" studios operating these days, I think of Digital Playground, NSDS, Wicked, Adam & Eve, Elegant Angel, Evil Angel and a few others. I find myself thinking of Vivid in "big terms" only in a historical sense. The way Ron Jeremy is a "big name" in porn. He's a household name, everyone's heard of him, everyone's seen him fuck, he's done some killer work but, really, no one's really all that excited if he has a new movie coming out.

Like I said, I'm not writing a manifesto here. I don't want to argue that they're not relevant anymore, I want to ask it. What do you say? Are they still a powerhouse? Why? Why not? Let's hear it. Let's discuss the fuck out of this shit. For one, I'm trying to leave my arrogant braggadocio behind and try to actually learn something from this site. So please, your thoughts.

Before I go: as for the issues folks seem to be having with TLA's "best twitterer" picks...don't really know what else to say other than that we're just trying to have a bit of fun here. I seriously pity the fuck out of anyone who considers "best twitterer" something to get upset about. No, wait...pity's not the right word...I seriously despise anyone who considers "best twitterer" something to get upset about. Even though we left out Belladonna, who's the best of the bunch.

Nuff said. Your comments regarding Vivid please? Feel free to bash my opinions as well as those of POPPORN as a whole. I didn't think this article through too much, and I'm high.


ASHTON LOVES JENNA


NYMPHO

Comments

My Opinion on Vivid (and you know what they say about those)

Here is one persons opinion on Vivid…They are no longer the industry’s leader their content has not changed in lord knows how long and they have been surpassed by the studios in which you have mentioned. In their hay-day the contract stars they had been fresh young and made people want to watch. Now they have contract stars very few can name and with the departure of the only fresh blood they had Meggan Mallone this person here doesn’t think Vivid will last very long and soon be passed by up and coming studios like Bluebird Films. I mean can you even name Vivid Contract stars anymore Shit Lia 19 would have been great contract star when she was actually 19 years old I mean who wants to see her naked anymore with all her shit being online for years upon years. Don’t get me wrong she’s hot but in porn years she’s a MILF. Go to http://vivid.com/vivid-girls/ half the girls aren’t really vivid girls, they were once upon a time, the others have rounded the mountain to MILF stars or are close to it. AJ Bailey is hot but at 25 shes a hop skip and a jump away from MILFdom. Where the excitement where is the new, fresh HOT young Starlets. Where are the Amia Miley’s , Capri Anderson’s, Natalia Rossi’s, Andy, San Dimas’s, Gracie Glam’s , Heather Starlet’s (chicks that actually do hot scenes) and half the roster at Metro Talent Management in young hot talent. This isn’t the late 90’s anymore this is 20fucking10. Vivid needs to open their eyes look around and SEARCH for new hot talent and utilize that talent rather than being lazy and letting some 25 or 26 year old or some shot out over exposed model walk through the door down to Directs office . And lay off the Milfs I mean they are hot Milfs don’t get me wrong but new fresh up and coming talent is where they need to be. Vivid needs their Jesse Jane. And this is just one fans opinion

Mr. Industry

Well if you consider the

Well if you consider the porn industries biggest pissing contest, AEE in Las Vegas, yes Vivid is still relevent. This is due to the fact they had a fucking ginormas plot of real estate with all kinds of fancy posters and shit like that right in the front entrance of the convention floor...this could be due to the fact that AEE (in my opion) is an event to show the puiblic how much money a company is making that year...but in actual awesome productions, I'm gonna have to agree with Meat, I can't really recall much buzz in the biz about Vivids next big production or contract girl or new directors or shits like that. Vivid now just seems to be about shelling out tons of dough for celeb sex tapes and getting girls who kinda do porn to do full on porn, not actually making good quality fuck flicks...And on a side note I hope TLA considered James Deen for best twitterer considering that dude has gotten at least five twitter picture accounts deleted from posting pics of ladies he is bangin that day

I so agree

I totally missed the celeb tapes, your right their own contract stars are out done by Milf'y Shauna Sands, Ass Queen Kim Kardashian, and what ever other B-List celeb decides to make a fuck flick. Lets face it Vivid has been outshined and out done by smaller studios in awesome productions. Digital will reign supreme till Vivid finds their Pirates, or their Will Ryder or Lee Roy Meyers oh how the mighty have fallen!

Seriously?

The kind of movie that Vivid represents -- bloated, overproduced feature -- and the contract girl system it pioneered can be expanded as an argument as to what's irrelevant to the industry in general.

Seriously, Digital Playground? If I wanted to watch Pirates, I'd rent Pirates... you know, the one with Keira Knightley and not the one with the CG animation rendered on a Playstation 2. Same with whatever clumsy comedy Jonathan Morgan or Stormy is trying to palm off as high (porno) art. If I wanted to watch tepid sex scenes with a really loud soundtrack from a stock music library, I'd watch Cinemax after midnight. Vivid, Digital Playground, Wicked (and yes, even Bluebird with this million dollar movie bullshit they're hyping) all seem to forget about the sex and push everything else about their movies -- the budget, the director, the locations it was shot on, how long it took to shoot, hell, Vivid or Wicked even used to have an ad campaign about how they spent more money on their craft service tables than most companies production budgets.

Digital Playground

Yeah but Digital Playground has Robby D and Stoya. That's something. I mean that's two things.

Well, they've got Robby D.

Stoya hasn't really been around much for quite a while now. Not that DP doesn't have a lot to offer anyways.

Offering Octomom a Contract

Short answer: No. Not relevant.

It's not just the reasons you listed but the dumb stunts that Vivid's pulled over the years that's tarnished its image. Anyone remember Vivid rims (for those car enthusiasts who want their dubs rolling on wheels branded from a porn studio)? Their push into the makeup industry (because who doesn't want their woman to look like a whore)? Probably not, but they happened -- and it was so far from their core business, people just rolled their eyes when the press releases hit AVN and XBiz. But the dumbest idea they've had is getting into the celeb sex tape business. For a company that sells itself as an A-list company with (supposedly) the best girls in the business, there's nothing more amateur and D-list than the a celeb sex tape and the people that are in them. I think this whole thing hit a peak with Vivid offering a contract to Octomom. If you were one of the contract girls, it sent a clear message that an unattractive, worn-out, mentally unbalanced attention whore with eight kids was made of the same stuff you were.

All of that the thrashing of a company that realizes it no longer makes good movies, a company that no longer can (or will) make the next superstar and that has no good ideas left, so it has to come up with stunts to stay relevant.

But then again, what does Steve Hirsch care? He's made his money. If he closed the company tomorrow, it's not like he'd have to worry where his next meal was coming from. He can afford a stale movie lineup from a company that's a black hole for its contract girls (as in, you never really hear about them after they sign with Vivid) and to slap his company's name on anything that catches his fancy for the moment.

Totally agree with this

Totally agree with this comment.

when I read this post I realised I couldn't name a single current Vivid girl... I've never been a massive fan of their work but I was always vaguely aware of what they were doing & who they were doing it with because they were so BIG, you couldn't escape finding out if you had any kind of interest in porn,

That said, I approve of the Vivid Ed stuff they do with Tristan Taormino.

Vivid's Relevance

As a huge supporter of Pop Porn's few releases to date (finishing up Jersey Shore later tonight most likely), I mean the following with all due respect but Vivid is STILL more relevant than most of their peers and will be several years down the road when most of the companies mentioned no longer exist (at least in current form). While I'm admittedly a contrarian by nature, the fact remains that whatever issues they have had with contract performers, look at their peers to see far worse. How many ladies has DP gone through in the last couple of years? How many people enjoy watching porn with obligatory condoms like Wicked (they don't bother me but I get a slew of hate mail any time I praise one of their movies)? NSDS is better known for their compilations than anything else but take a real look at some of their parodies to see how churned out they can be. A&E are best known for their toy lines, many a lot of fun, than their couples-friendly porn (with exceptions for their handful of big yearly award winners) and Evil/JJV are both distributors of smaller directors (most of whom are great at what they do to).

So, in this age of decline, exactly what makes Vivid relevant? Let's start with Tristan's works as they bring in a whole new audience, the director constantly in the press and touring to spread her message. Follow up with their wise decision to dump PT in favor of B. Skow, Skow's Brand New Faces easily the best newcomer series on the market today. He has brought a gonzo sensibility to the company without lowering their standards into the generic-porn market, his starlet showcases much better than what they had before (it doesn't hurt that most of his work is measured not only in quantity but quality as well). That they have recruited Axel Braun to handle big name parodies or their pseudo-celebrity releases have gone on to outsell almost anything else on the market keeps Vivid's name out there in the public eye, all of these factors bringing new people into trying out porn.

Let's face it, the under-appreciated PopPorn titles did not garner tons of accolades and awards like they should have, though had the Vivid marketing team been pushing them I can almost assure you the results would have been different. They don't cater to the most jaded of raincoater aficionados like Elegant, Evil or Jules do but I rarely see anyone from those companies on national television (except when they have legal troubles). Vivid sponsors events outside of the industry too, has their own clothing line, and have been in transition of late while they try new partnerships that might keep them afloat when others simply bail. You can argue that Vivid is not as relevant as they used to be but they can still "make" a star or keep one's career shining long after they would have disappeared elsewhere. I know it sounds cliched but there is more than a little truth to the saying that if you haven't watched Vivid lately, you haven't watched them at all.

Wow!

Now this is the kind of discussion we were definitely hoping to see! Don, you make excellent points and believe me, as Meat Ball said, we're not trying to argue one position over the other but simply asking the question. I'm stoked we got such a detailed, insightful response, it definitely adds to the debate.

- Not Fade Away

Vivid still has Savanna Samson and Sunny Leone.

Vivid still has Savanna Samson and Sunny Leone. The only true stars left. Well Sunny Leone works for other companies and I don't know how that's allowed. I don't know how she swung that contract. But those are the last two stars left. Meggan Mallone was really the future. But she didn't renew her contract this November and is dating their director B Skow. I don't even know why Nikki Jayne is even still called a Vivid girl anymore. She barely shows up at industry events and wasn't even at this year's AEE convention and award show. That alone used to get you booted from Vivid. But maybe because she was once engaged to Derek Hay, she's still there. And then there's AJ Bailey and Lia19. Lia's first release was recently and she wasn't with any men. Who gives a woman a Vivid contract and allows her to get away with g/g ??

I've talked to others about this and we've come to the conclusion Steve Hirsch isn't really running Vivid anymore and the ship is a shadow of its former self. They didn't even have a single Vivid girl in their Throat movie. A big budget feature and you don't even put your own contract girls in the movie? That shows what little faith he has in them. They even allowed Briana Banks and Monique Alexander to leave and it seems they were pushed out.

Oh yeah...

I did just want to mention that the cover for Nympho, seen above, is really, really hot...just sayin'

- Not Fade Away

Wait a minute . . .

I am not some hardcore weed smoking industrial analyst, but I have watched my share of porn. I do appreciate reading these comments and I also liked the fact we are being solicited for our thoughts on the question. I am not a Vivid fan today. Watch very little of their videos. Not that their output is bad, but it just does not interest me.

But the question of relevance is not found in any one persons opinion. I vote each day for those studios I think matter, with my wallet. Vivid matters because it has money. It matters for example as mentioned here in the comments it staked out a huge plot of land at the AVN awards, because it could afford too. Vivid will matter until it no longer can afford to produce movies due to a dried up revenue stream.

Porn is like any other business activity the bottom line is profit. The more profit you have the more relevant you are. I don't mean this in a anti-capitalist spirit, because I like profit myself. The point here is the it takes capital to produce a movie and the quality of any given product is directly related to how much it costs to make. The simple fact is that money is the lubrication, pun intended, that gives us the huge fucking plethora of attractive women working in porn today - all for our viewing pleasure!

Vivid is relevant because it can entice new talent to fuck, on screen, for the very first time, for money.

They didn't use a single Vivid Girl in "Throat"

"Throat" was a fine piece of smut, but they used Sasha Grey and Penny Flame in the two starring roles. Can you imagine Wicked or DP making a big movie without putting one of their girls on the cover?

DP lost Stoya, the hottest contract girl in the business. But their recent signings, including Kayden Kross, Raven Alexis, and Janie Summers, indicate that they are turning up their game.

Wicked has jessica drake, who sizzles on-screen and is the best actress in the business. Their big features, like "2040" and "Fallen," are great.

I will rent NS/DS for Ashlynn Brooke, and Amy Reid has the best body in the history of porn. The market seems to like their parodies.

Adam & Eve has Bree Olson, and "8th Day" was great.

Zero Tolerance has the Popporn boys.

Hustler has Will Ryder/Jeff Mullen, who clearly knows marketing and PR.

Three of the best hardcore companies work with directors not girls: Evil Angel, Elegant Angel, and Jules Jordan. Of the three, the third best has both Jules Jordan and Jenna Haze!

Vivid distributes celebrity sex tapes, and I've never seen one of Tristan Taormino's educational videos. Their attempt to get into Alt-Porn makes Burning Angel look like the most relevant company in the business. Let's face it, the last time Vivid was clearly "relevant" was when Jenna Jameson was under contract, and Wicked did the hard work of turning her into a star before Vivid signed her.

Brand New Faces????? Are you Serious

You guys talk about Brand New Faces (BNF) like it actually gets updated or shot anymore! Half the Comp DVD’s that drop are from old shit you can see on the site since 08’. Vivid got lazy, whether DP girls leave or stay is irrelevant …You still hear about them! They still are the industry leaders in Marketing and Promotion of the Contract Girls and when they leave you hear about that as well! Meggan left and you hear nothing except a couple posts on gossip blog sites. And as it was mentioned above can you even name Vivid stars, they let the best one walk away in Nov. (and yes Brian the reason that Boxcover is hot is it has Meggan Mallone on it) As for Savannah that haggard porn whore does nothing anymore except appear on the Howard Stern Show twice a year to say she is still relevant just because you say it and have a name like VIVID attached to you doesn’t make it so (ask the hundreds of mediocre porn actresses that walk around LA calling themselves PORNSTARS…girl I haven’t heard of you!). What Vivid should do is shoot an all ANAL gangbang of Savannah have Jim Powers shoot it, and Porno DAN host it (it will actually get press) and send her packing. As for Sunny, as beautiful as she is, is a Vivid girl only in theory that’s why she can shoot with other companies.
And ask Playboy how well they are doing slapping their name on everything and forgetting about what actually made them Playboy. Is VIVID doing the same thing? How Ironic one sinking ship (VIVID) tries to save another (PLAYBOY) only time will tell how that works out!
When the dust has settled and the economic downturn of the industry is over Porn will still be here and I am sure VIVID will still be there as well it’s too big not to be however they may want to go ask some of those GONZO directors (recommendation Belladonna) what it’s going to take to shoot good content again.
As for getting a girl into porn now days you don’t need a VIVID to entice them. They come by the bus loads everyday to whoever can help them pay rent (thank you economy!) Who wants to wait for a 30 day payroll job when Reality Kings pays better, pays same day and you get more exposure! Vivid lost the battle, but the war isn’t over!

Mr. Industry

vivids future

say what you want about them being irrelevant, they have one thing most don't have, which are cable tv channels.
porn brought vhs to life. it brought the internet to life. and now it will bring 3d tv to life.
i would love to have those channels right now. it's their saving grace.

i can't wait to see what is done with 3d and porn. i hope the 3d aspect helps the industry destroy the free porn sites and gives the business back to the producer.

i would love to invest in a 3d porn pioneer.

3D? Really?

I didn't even know 3D TV exists. And are you really saying that pornography is the backbone of VHS and the internet? Because, no offense, but that's ridiculous.

it's not ridiculous. it's

it's not ridiculous. it's actually fact.
vhs originally took off because porn became accessible at home.
the internet started to get mass users when gambling and porn became accessible and you didn't have to leave your computer to rent, go to a store, or order it off pay perview or get it from a cable channel.

people who watch porn are early adopters for technology. its a fact.
the first 3d tvs are going on sale this year. espn and other networks have said that they will make content for it. specialized channels. these will probably be failures until porn starts making 3d programming. more people will buy the tvs. then 3dtvs will become mainstream.

http://www.law.indiana.edu/fclj/pubs/v49/no1/johnson.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2002/mar/03/internetnews.observerfo...

do a google search on this. you can read stuff all day.

but please, don't call it ridiculous. you are just making an ass out of yourself.

Fair enough.

Hey, making as ass out of myself is my thing!

Just sounds ridiculous is all. I got into VHS because my dad taped Star Wars off of network TV and I got into the internet because there was so much stuff there to whack off to. Oh, hey, wait a second...

i WILL fight you, meatball.

i WILL fight you, meatball.

Fight me?

Is this Vince Neil? Dude, that part of the Without You video where you knock all them boulders down is fucking TOIGHT!

Random thoughts on relevance

By the numbers:

Thanks Brian!

Darrah, Vivid has long had g/g contract performers as a mainstay, Sunny taking forever to do men (and only a few times with boyfriends), Janine, etc.

Throat: If you watched the Showtime mini-series (which was far, far better than the movie itself by the way), you'd know why there were no contract performers in the flick. It was stated at the onset that Hirsch was looking for someone new, eventually settling on Sascha Gray but only after all sorts of drama. The idea was to generate some renewed interest in the company, which it did to an extent, not hype the same old performers.

Money=relevance=very true Axelrod.

Contract Girl Comparison: DP has Jesse Jane, everyone else is expendable according to insiders. Just ask the half dozen+ contract girls that fled from them in the last year or two, including Heather "Janie Summers" Starlet recently. Wicked has lost some of their best people in recent years too, thankfully keeping Drake my favorite by far though Stormy is more popular. Both appear to be planning to leave or move behind the camera before too long and none of the others generating a lot of buzz. The owner of NS/DS has gone around proclaiming the death of industry porn in less than two years so referring to them as more relevant than others strikes me as odd, their churned out parodies nearly as hit or miss as Hustler. A&E lost Carmen Luvana, Kayden Kross, and a host of others but look at how long it took them to make Upload-lite, err, I mean The 8th Day and all the trouble it caused. Hustler dumped their contract performers awhile back as cost ineffective. Zero Tolerance has Sara "changed her name" Sloane with Courtney Cummz apparently free now but the Pop Porn flicks comprise a small percentage of their output, most of it strictly gonzo.

Brand New Faces: They started shooting again in January and February but as Skow is the only director working for them outside of Tristan at the moment, he has had to pick up the slack and do it all. As far as the series itself, there are probably more newcomers as yet unreleased to DVD from the website than will ever come out on DVD but given the way he gets nearly an hour or so with most of them, his work on newcomers tends to be definitive, unlike the rest of the industry.

Marketing: DP lost Adella and much of their output is so generic that most scenes could be placed in any of their series without people noticing. They make a big movie every three years or so, directed by Ali of course, and leave the rest of it for Robbie (who could do a lot better than those lame Celeste titles he directs for her, if given the opportunity). Their feature-lite flicks have been okay but largely disposable but for Jesse.

Relevance by company (a few, not including money):
Hustler: Larry Flynt
A&E: Phil Harvey and the toys they make
Wicked Pictures: Gateway porn consisting of two positions and a blowjob, all condom, a few big budget titles a year
Vivid: Name recognition from various endeavors, history in the industry, contract performers over the years
Internet companies: low cost, high output but their relevance is collective, not individual, and decreasing because users don't need them to get all the free porn available
DP: Years of marketing prowess with high profile contract gals, Jesse the only one to "make it" and marketing going down the crapper of late

Vivid What? ... Vivid Who?, Jigga What? Jigga Who?

Ok I will have to address a couple of things,

1. TV stations: DP just inked a deal. RK just inked a deal, it’s only a matter of time before the rest will follow like a Brazzers (whether you like them or not) etc... and the rest of the major Mega Sites, and just like their porno they (Vivid) will be out done and out classed as they are still stuck in the 20th century * side note someone needs to tell Vivid Jenna Jameson retired and so did her whack ass porn.

2. 3D Porn: DP is already ahead of the curve on this one and will have the first if not the first the biggest release in 3D called a mega hit “Pirates 3D” this time around they are making a complete theatrical version’s to be released to the mainstream public, and though acting will probably be bad, with the exception of Evan Stones comedic relief, it can’t make me fall asleep any faster than “Throat: A cautionary tale” or the famed crossover star Sasha Grey’s “the Girlfriend Experience” so it will stand amongst the best porn has got to offer (except the popporn boys “Guide to Making Fuck” a classic!) and it will take up awards like no other!

3. Contract Stars: There should be a whole separate post on this one! But I will shorten it as much as I can. The old Hollywood system of production companies signing contract stars is once again soooo yesterday Vivid started it Vivid should end it. However, it does go to show you that what Will Ryder and the famed Douchbag Derik Hay were arguing about http://popporn.com/node/1441 is very important and more than just gossip column fodder, and the winner in my opinion goes to Ryder. Porn Girls want contracts. And Porn companies want contract stars (it’s cheaper). Pretty much if a company likes an actress and that actress makes them sell DVD’s Memberships, the companies will say we want a contract star! We will shoot you less give you an inflated rate and promote the shit out of you, so you don’t break our bank. So the “contract star” now shoots one or two scenes a month for $2000 and has a mass marketing and publicity package. Granted they get more money for dancing and appearance etc…yada, yada, yada. But some of those are included in their contract and they don’t get extra. They sign contracts to get paid less than if they were doing Gonzo, for more press. So press and marketing is very important to a model. Riddle me this: Vivid offered Miss Kagney Linn Carter a contract when she first started in this biz, Kagney would have brought that company up to par with her Jenna Jameson looks and amazing body and star quality, why didn’t she take it! Because who wants a 40,000 a year contract when you first start out in the biz. You make more than that in 3 months (or you did) something has to change. Contract stars with the exception of Jesse Jane are nobody’s anymore the stars of today are Gonzo Queens Jenna Haze, Belladonna, Sasha Grey, Johanna Angel and with up and coming stars like Andy San Dimas being groomed to take the reins. The day of the contract star are dying shit they are dead! That’s why Hustler did away with that shit! (Side note all these girls do I.R., anal and are no holds barred that’s what people want to see not some inflated tittied blonde porn girl that’s afraid to take a black dick or take it in the ass).

So back on point (had a rant in me) Wicked’s Milf Stars, DP’s ever quitting new stars, Vivid’s nobody stars, A&E well at least they reigned in Bree Olsen (she’s a baddass) and a chubby Heather Starlet look alike, they should of waited a few months and could have had the real thing! I say what contract stars???? Who cares who they have cause obviously the fans don’t they are overrated.

4. Brand New Faces- Obsolete –They have been outdone by other Newbie sites. Using the excuse that B.Skow is there only shooter for a Mega company like Vivid is a fucking cop-out. They have the means to hire a good director to make that what it once was. Stop making excuses for them, I am a hater let me hate! LMAO!!!

My companies in order of Relevance:

1. Brazzers love em or hate em in today’s porn they are the most relevant their unsightly practices could and have hurt the industry tremendously. (now to the good companies)
2. Hustler far superior to the rest, did away with the stupid contract system. Great product, great scenes
3. Digital Playground Adella or NO they have made the biggest impact on the business they have the most well known Contract Star to date, and it is a contract girls dream (if they can last) and only time will tell if Adella’s departure will affect them. It is too early to tell
4. X-play- I am winning awards bitches. Lmao
5. A&E although they do mostly toys no company has a Sex Machine named Bree Olsen that alone put them at 5.
6. Wicked although their contract stars looked better in 1999, I give em props for still using condoms but they are in serious need of some new blood!
7. Vivid the only reason they are at 7 is I don’t want to do a top 10 I have 420 time coming up ;-)

This is only one man’s opinion

Mr. Industry

3D?!?

Some of the comments are certainly accurate but if DP wastes money on 3D technology that few will buy, it will become their latest "RED" camera system that they weaken by using so many filters, gels, and low level lighting. Their own press releases have been routinely quoting their own marketing staff too, hardly a sign of growing relevance. They are still relevant but losing ground faster than most, just take an actual look at most of their product. Still, I'm curious why you think they have made the biggest impact on the industry since their contract system is largely broken, their timid use of technology is nothing special, and they don't do anything others before them haven't done. I've been a fan for a long time but cut way back on reviewing their stuff as their quality control dropped, waiting until they take steps to revive.

TV Stations: They might be the darling of the moment to some but they will end up on the wayside as streaming internet further erodes cable/satellite/broadcast. That hackers have already broken all the systems above mean it will eventually result in just a faster means for pirates to steal content, no matter which delivery system is used.

Contracts (in general): Most gals want them once they are in decline, then unable to command a premium per scene and in less demand. Companies like them because they save money and can use their popularity/fanbase to promote sales. In any case, Hustler did not get rid of them because they didn't work, they got rid of them as yet another cost saving measure. Ask those that have shot for them over the years how much less they pay regardless of their agreed upon contract (and if you think their works are typically better than mediocre, you must work for them because you are one of the few; that is why they distribute X-Play's superior product).

Contract stars: They don't individually add to a company's relevance but company's like Wicked or Vivid have had such a lengthy history with them that they are the exception. Even then, Savanna is just as solid an actress as Jessica, both being wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy ahead of any others that come to mind.

BNF: Again, not excusing them, just pointing out that they have more content already than they will ever distribute on physical media. Those scenes are still better than any other newcomer material shot to date unless you like torture porn or circus act sex.

Relevance: I suppose most here are comparing apples to oranges since there has been little talk on relevance to "what". In the original article, other companies were mentioned and compared just as history was discussed. Is Vivid relevant to the porn industry right now, absent of their past? I would say yes since they still make money, are still quoted and interviewed by mainstream press, still act as a draw for women that would not otherwise try porn, and several other reasons. I would also say that they are relevant because of their history, a rich history for all sorts of reasons that has served as a (largely) positive role model for many in the industry.

Jigga Please!!!

Would you consider Playboy still relevant? They have a failing cable channel and a bankrupt company (all because they wouldn’t change with the times) According to your above statement you would. Relevance is not based on “just because mainstream media interviews them” who the fuck is the mainstream media to porn (I go to Popporn.com for my porno news) I would rather Porno Dan interview Steven Hirsch at least then you would get some real questions and real porn publicity. Everytime they interview Steven Hirsch or someone from Vivid it’s the same old shit BORING. I equate Vivid to the Actress that once was who turns to Playboy to get naked. In that last ditch effort to remain in the public eye! What’s that…wait a second Asher did buy 1 million shares of Playboy, they aren’t LIKE the old fading actress they ARE the fading actress!

Positive Role Model??? DON’T TRY TO CHURCH IT UP SON! They peddle smut (crappy smut but smut nonetheless) They are a porn company they are no better than the Swirlie Girls website! Bottom Line you still have chicks getting fucked on film for money!

BNF: Cumfiesta, Pure18 both newbie scenes the girls are not being tortured or required to do circus acts "My god man !"

As for Jessica and Savannah you have to be an old school fan of porn to even remember their names if it wasn’t for popporns.com blog about the LADAY GAGA video I wouldn’t of even known it was her (got to love the split second of airtime CROSSOVER AWARD NOM!) or that she still even did porno granted at least she still looks good for a MILF but more people know who LISA ANN is than Jessica. Last time I seen Jessica was on Pornicopia “going down in the Valley” on HBO 10 years ago! And she is not wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy ahead of Belladonna, or Jenna Haze. As for Savanna JIGGA PLEASE!

Well Don this hater is done with his haterade and needs to get some sleep So I’m gonna watch some relevant porn (Codi Carmichael in Zero Tolerance’s The Doll House) jerk off and go to sleep. So I can live to Hate-on Vivid another day.

Till next Time

Mr. Industry (Hater Extraordinaire )

Steve Hirsch Makes Another Pitch to Octo MOM to pay off house

Need I say more!

Mabey he should of offered 200K to Meggan Mallone!

Mr. Industry

Anonymous people seem to miss the point more than others ;)

Mr. Industry,
I admit to being "old school" in the sense of remembering the past performers I enjoyed watching, having some semblance of history, and being able to compare things of various sorts. I like Bella and Jenna both, each of them usually providing lots of enthusiasm in their performances but neither of them have ever shown to be much good at acting. As far as Playboy, declining sales do not change that they are indeed still relevant in many ways, more relevant than the most profitable porn company in terms of public acceptance, knowledge, and capacity to generate public interest.

Role Models: Some people see things in stark contrasts while others can differentiate varying shades of gray. Vivid has been a far better role model since it was founded, warts and all, than most of the others (many of which have come and gone).

BNF: There are many companies offering discs and/or website scenes of newcomers. This has been a mainstay of the industry for even longer than Ed Powers or Randy West's series but few are capably shot and bring in quality performers. I have yet to be consistently impressed with Cum Fiesta, Pure 18, or any of the others out there as I have with BNF. There might be better selections if a specific fetish is needed by a viewer but in terms of straightforward sex, "guaranteed" at that, I'm always open to finding something better.

Lisa Ann Vs. Jessica Drake or Savanna: Apples and oranges, Lisa only really making any significant progress with her characterization of the former Alaska governor. Otherwise, if you compare the two in terms of acting, Drake is clearly more polished (and has been for a long time). That doesn't diminish the value of either of them in the movies they make, both having audiences more loyal than newcomers tend to generate.

Oh well, Codi's hot enough and the "Official Jersey Shore" parody was a lot of fun too. Have fun! :)

Dudes. Kimberly Kane shoots

Dudes. Kimberly Kane shoots for Vivid Alt. That is some sweet shit right there.

Still?

It's good to see you Black Six! Quick question though, I thought Vivid Alt was pretty much dead (McKay twittered about leaving Vivid and taking the "alt" with him) so: is she still directing for them?

Hmm, didn't know that, if

Hmm, didn't know that, if they lose KK that would be a bigger deal than McKai, his movies never had much heat in them, although I liked some of the scenes in Content recently.

I'm pretty sure

KK has a Vivid flick coming out soon but its straight up Vivid and not Vivid Alt

Vivid

As the national sales manager for Vivid for the last 20 years I think I qualify to comment here.
I will not go into TLA Awards show, as they have been a customer of mine since day one.
This is the first I heard about their awards show, I was never asked to send any screeners or anything related to this Awards honor.
What I will address is Vivid, how relevant we are and what we are doing.
In the last year Vivid has received more 4, 4.5, 5, star reviews than any other company.
Just check ADT or Gamelink reviews, or DVD EMPIRE reviews and you will see this is a fact.
B.Skow has taken over all production for Vivid and has been making a superior product.
Hanna Hilton, Meggan Mallone, Savanna, Sunny, Nikki, sell very well, as does AJ Baily.
DMJ the Resurrection with Belladonna will be releasing next week. Batman, with all the original costumes and original Batmobile, shot by Axel Braun will release later this year.
We have gone on the forums and asked what would make us better, the people replied and we made the changes immediately.
Vivid has hardened up it's boxes, and really injected gonzo sex in a feature film. Made all ads skippable, and even segregated them in the menu section.
Those that are bashing Vivid are those that haven't seen Vivid. The people that have gone back and given Vivid a second look are very happy and repeat customers.
I can say with the most confidence, Vivids numbers are still at the top of the heap.
When you watch Oprah this year and they had Jenna on, the movies that are mentioned are Vivid.
Here are reviews from customers that are on one of the sale, rental and vod sites, customers that watched the movies.
Hanna's House 5 stars
B. Skow followed Hanna around her house for a few days and shot everything in sight. Read More

(8 customer ratings)

The Pinch 5 stars
The plan works but it works too well now Matt's ego's as big as his imaginary cock! Read More

(5 customer ratings)

Undress Me 5 stars
It's like having the pole in your home, not just in your pants. Read More

(7 customer ratings)

Flashback (Vivid) 5 stars
Memories... some get you down. Some get you up. And some get you off. Read More

(6 customer ratings)

Suck It (Vivid) 4.5 stars
Vivid took their best sword-swallowers to give them facials and we don't mean the mud mask kind. Read More

(11 customer ratings)

Brand New Faces #18 - Asian Edition 5 stars
We find brand new girls who have never made an adult film and shoot them for the first time ever. Read More

(5 customer ratings)

Brand New Faces #16 5 stars
We find brand new girls who have never made an adult film and shoot them for the first time ever. Read More

(5 customer ratings)

Catch Me (Vivid) 5 stars
First she blew it up with The Nikki Jane Experiment, AVN's favorite feature of the month, and the top rated video on all the big ratings websites, for Nikki's sheer hotness. Read More

(10 customer ratings)

Going Deep (Vivid)4.5 stars
How Deep Is Your Love? Read More

(12 customer ratings)

All Dressed Up 5stars
The school girl. The cop. The prisoner. The nurse. The French maid. Read More

(8 customer ratings)

Strip Tease - Meggan Mallone 5 stars
AVN's favorite strip and tease director B. Skow gets his horny way with Meggan Mallone and the results will blow you away! Read More

(14 customer ratings)

Bounce 5 stars
The hottest, natural girls in porn including gorgeous new blonde superstar Hanna Hilton in three big, wet, double-d scenes! Read More

(17 customer ratings)

The Nikki Jayne Experiment 4.5 stars
She sucks like a pro, plays to the camera really well and takes anal like someone who has been doing it for years. Read More

(22 customer ratings)

Brand New Faces #13 5 stars
We find brand new girls who have never made an adult dvd and shoot them for the first time ever. Read More

(6 customer ratings)

Damaged Goods (Vivid) 4.5 stars
New lovers Monique and Alex are moving in together. Read More

(24 customer ratings)
These are reviews from Gamelink and there are more on ROG Reviews and ADT.
They are from customers, not critics.

I will tell you I have sold more Masseuse in the last 6 months then any other company has of 5 of their new releases.
I would pose this question to Meatball, when is the last time you saw a Vivid movie?
Before writing an article like the one you did, I would ask that you view the product, then voice your opinion.
So to answer you question, is Vivid still relevant , yes very much so, as a matter a fact, still the leader in the industry.

Howard...

Thanks for chiming in...we're pretty stoked at how well this discussion took off. It's great that you took time out to voice your thoughts and I'm sure the readers appreciate it. As I'm sure, you understand with your years of experience, fans and the industry always wax and wane and you certainly can never please everyone. But as this discussion has pointed out, people still fall on both sides of the fence.

I think the most important thing you mentioned, besides all the positive accolades and reviews is that Vivid continues to change as the market changes, specifically listening to fans and consumers to put out what they feel represents their brand. That's all anyone could hope for...that and killing tube sites.

- Not Fade Away

to answer the question -

Last Vivid movie I saw was Meggan's Sexy Stories, which came out pretty recently. I liked it a whole lot, though I ususally can't really get into Paul Thomas' stuff. But I was never trying to make the point of whether or not I like the movies.

That said, while it is absolutely unlike POPPORN to try and be intelligent, I was just looking to have an intelligent forum on an industry issue that I've heard come up a few times in the past. I wholeheartedly appreciate the input from everybody who chimed in. Except perhaps Bangs. Dude's a pig.

Paul Thomas is not shooting

Paul Thomas is not shooting for Vivid any longer except on special occasions.
B Skow is at the helm, and has done an exceptional job.
I would suggest you take a look at the movies I listed above, I think you will find a new Vivid you may not know existed.
I started commenting back in July of last year on ADT, I asked the same question you did, but I also asked what could we do to improve the product and make it superior.
The good people on ADT are anything but soft spoken, they let me know loud and clear what they wanted changed. What they liked and what they hated.
We took all of that feedback on worked very hard on making the product excellent.
It is easy to be a target when you are on top. The key to staying on top, which Vivid has for 25 years, is to listen and allow yourself to change.
Are we relevant, yes I think so.
When you have two other companies take our business model and try and beat us at our own game, you must stay current and fresh.
That is what we do best.
There is no other company that made it to Oprah this year, when Nightline seeks a comment, they look to Steven Hirsch.
The Octomom thing was sincere, Steven would have paid off her house, but more importantly, it made local, National, and International news.
As for TLAs Award show, the reason we were not nominated was because we didn't submit anything to be nominated for.
We were never contacted by anyone at TLA, which I am of course looking into right now.
I can tell you it is not because lack of sales with TLA, they buy a very large number of movies. I have been friends with Eric and Rich for a very long time. I think it may have been an oversight on their part, but I have a call into Brian Sokel right now.
The people that bash Vivid, I have found, haven't seen Vivid in a long while. If they did see what we have been doing, they would love it.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.